|
Sherwood Forester Issue 8 - December 2004
|
|
|
| Editorial Comment |
![]() |
A Merry Christmas to everyone and welcome to
a bumper
edition of the 'Sherwood Forester'. Our cover image comes from an
American comic from the 1950's depicting Richard Greene in The Adventures of
Robin Hood. American comics are the subject of one of our articles in this
issue.
|
| In this Issue: - | |
| Robin’s Comic Book Adventures |
Welcome to Allen W. Wright, who provides an excellent article on Robin Hood and American comic books. Allen, an independent scholar, has spoken at several international academic conferences on the outlaw legend and runs his own highly commended website Robin Hood - Bold Outlaw of Barnsdale and Sherwood.
|
| Episode Review - The Debt |
Anna
Fraser reviews one of her favourites episodes.
|
| On Location - Bodiam Castle |
Continuing our "On Location" feature.
Anna Fraser visits Bodiam Castle. The article also includes some
wonderful artwork by Anna with additional photographs by Evelyn
Modlinger.
|
| Ladies of Sherwood |
More from "The Ladies of Sherwood": Suzette,
Elsbeth, Lady of Locksley and Marian.
|
| A Film a Week for Mr. Greene |
From an article thought to have been published in 1956.
|
| Letters To The Editors (emails to the editors) |
Please do not hesitate to email us at
trhas@hotmail.com with your thoughts.
|
| Robin’s Comic Book Adventures | |||||||||||
|
We are pleased to welcome Allen W. Wright to our pages, who takes a look at Robin Hood and North American comics. These days,
North American comic books are dominated by superheroes. Yes, there are
espionage comics, horror comics and some truly wonderful autobiographical
comics. But for the most part, the long-underwear brigade rules the
medium. This was not the case in the 1950s. Aside from Superman, Batman
and Wonder Woman, nearly all the prominent superheroes of the 1940s had
retired. In their place, there were cowboy comics, romance comics, and
more worryingly… horror and crime comics. These last two genres
triggered a Senate investigation, purporting that comics caused juvenile
delinquency. To avoid official action, the American comic book publishers
instituted a voluntary code which drove a stake through crime and horror
comic books and locked comics into telling infantile stories for decades
to come. In some ways,
this code led to the return of the morally upright superhero genre. But
before the revival of the Flash in 1956 and the introduction of Spider-Man
and his ilk in the 1960s, American publishers were still looking for the
next big thing. And for that, they turned to television. What they saw was
Richard Greene’s The Adventures of Robin Hood. Relatively safe, classic
tales with a literary pedigree – this outlaw’s adventures seemed
respectable. And more importantly, no one held the copyright on Robin
Hood. Several publishers put out Robin Hood comics while Greene’s merry
men were riding through the television glens. I prepared an academic paper for some conferences (one held at Nottingham) looking how Robin’s adventures had been cleaned up in a way acceptable to a code which forbade the celebration of criminal acts.
I have
republished the first Magazine Enterprises Robin Hood story on my website
at http://www.boldoutlaw.com/rhbal/52poach.html.
Another story from issue 4 can be found at http://www.boldoutlaw.com/rhbal/sirrobin.html.
Frank Bolle drew these comics. In the 1950s,
most comic books were anthologies containing more than one story. Issue 52
(the first issue) featured three Robin Hood stories, a comic book
adventure of Sir Galant of the Round Table (whose name was perhaps a
little too similar to that of the much better comic strip hero Prince
Valiant) and a text piece called In the Days of Knights giving some
educational material for the kids. Robin’s most common foes were Prince John, Sir Gui of Glamore (named Gui of Gomley in one story and liked a counterpart to the more familiar Guy of Gisborne), and Robert Murdach. Robert Murdach was for all intents and purposes the Sheriff of Nottingham. However, the comics didn’t often name him as such. Instead he was usually referred to by his full name. Ralph Murdach was the name of the sheriff in Henry Gilbert’s popular Robin Hood children’s novel, and Ralph Murdac was the name of a historical Sheriff of Nottinghamshire in the 1180s and 1190s.
The new sheriff didn’t reappear in the issue, but there were further comic book stories. Sir Galant paid a visit “The Deserted Castle” Robin Hood and the Duncan-like Little John told two very different stories of their encounter with Sir Gui in “The Strong Man and the Archer”. Finally, Robin Hood encounters “The Chinese Dragon” which is really a cannon from China. Robin uses the Chinese weapon to storm Prince John’s castle decades before Azeem brought gunpowder to Kevin Costner’s Sherwood. Issue 8 (November 1958) was the last issue in Magazine Enterprise’s The Adventures of Robin Hood series. The inside cover was full-page black-and-white photo of Bernadette O’Farrell in costume, autographed “Maid Marian”.
An agent of
Prince John deceives three returning Crusaders
into attacking peasants and Robin Hood in “Three Who Came Back”.
Ambushed while taking a bath, Robin fights the invaders in what appears to
be swimming trunks. Sir Galant fights Danish invaders and “The Ghost
Knight”. Finally, Robin has adventures that meet the friendly dares of
Friar Tuck and Maid Marian, and a more devious dare by Sir Gui and the
sheriff. Robin Hood
did have some comic book adventures in Britain during the 1950s.
Publishers such as World, Miller and Streamline/United Anglo-American
reprinted the American Robin Hood comics of the 1950s. TV Heroes had a
Robin Hood comic feature. Amalgamated Press published black-and-white
Robin Hood stories in their Sun and Thriller Comics Library series.
Amalgamated Press and Fleetway also published four Robin Hood annuals
(1957-1960) with colour and black-and-white stories. The Amalgamated Press
Robin Hood had reddish-blond hair and a goatee, quite different from his
TV and American counterparts. From April to
August 1959, Pearson’s TV Picture Stories apparently published three
comic book adaptations of “The Adventures of Robin Hood” episodes.
Those stories were “The Moneylender” (TVP, issue 8), “Friar Tuck”
(TVP 13) and “Husband for Marion” (TVP 24). Some of the
background information for my paper and this article came from "Seven
Robins!" from the Nolan's Notebook column in the May 1998 issue of
Comic Book Marketplace. It gave me a nudge in the right direction when I
was first tracking down the old comics. I now own all of the
Sussex/Magazine Enterprises issues. I have quite a few North American
Robin Hood comics from the 1950s. I also own three of British annuals and
one Thriller Comics Library issue. Allen W Wright Further pictures can be found at the following links:
Little
John from "Sir Robin Hood" in issue 4, not looking like Archie
Duncan
Adventures
of Robin Hood, issue 6 interior cover
Robert
Murdach (sheriff) in his pre-Wheatley look in "Revolt of the
Peasants" from issue 6 Adventures
of Robin Hood, issue 7 cover
Robin
Hood and a Duncanesque Little John from "The Strong Man and the
Archer", also in issue 7 Adventures
of Robin Hood, issue 8 cover Adventures
of Robin Hood, issue 8 interior cover, Patricia Driscoll as Maid Marian |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
A stranger claims to
be a member of Robin Hood’s band. He
robs the poor, takes Friar Tuck’s alms money, and fatally wounds John
Dale, a tenant on Lady Marian’s estate.
Robin and Will go to investigate.
The stranger turns out to be Martin, who saved Robin’s life seven
years before, during the crusade. He
is a wanted man, and is seeking refuge in Sherwood.
And he is present when Friar Tuck and Lady Marian visit the outlaw
camp. Robin has a dilemma: he
cannot accept Martin (“we’ve got no room for criminals”, he tells
him), but he cannot refuse; not only because he owes Martin his life, but
also - because Martin would reveal to the Sheriff that Marian and Friar Tuck
are friends of the outlaws. So
he decides to let Martin take part in one raid, hoping that the Sheriff’s
men see him with the band - “As soon as the Sheriff thinks that he’s a
member of the band, he won’t believe a word he says”. Martin breaks away,
and goes raiding on his own. But
the Deputy Sheriff soon disarms him, and has him at his mercy. He says, as he aims an arrow at Martin, “I don’t think there’s any point in my taking you back
for trial. I think I’ll just
enter in the records that you were killed trying to escape”. Robin intervenes, demanding that the Sheriff let Martin go
free, and he does, because his men are outnumbered by the outlaws.
Robin points out to Martin that his debt is now paid in full – he
saved his life from the Sheriff. He
orders Martin to leave Sherwood, but Martin refuses.
Robin proposes a duel with one arrow each.
He shoots an arrow into the ground, and tells Martin to do the same.
“You run to your arrow, I run to mine.
The first one to get to an arrow has the advantage.
Then we shoot to kill”. But
Martin does not play by the rules - he shoots his arrow into a tree.
It is stuck firmly, and Robin cannot remove it.
He decides on a desperate course of action – to shoot Martin’s
arrow back at him. He
watches Martin’s line of shot closely, and then turns sideways, letting
Martin shoot the arrow into his left arm.
He then manages to pull the arrow out and, with almost superhuman
effort, aims and shoots Martin through the heart.
*** “The Debt” is
possibly the most dramatic episode in the series.
There is little humour here – everything is done in earnest.
Tension can be felt from the very beginning, when, in the opening
scene, Friar Tuck is the target of Martin’s warning shot (and his
sarcastic taunts). Martin is a
most intriguing villain - and a very dangerous one. Robin truly “meets his
match” here – it is “The Adventures” equivalent of the violent story
of Guy of Guisbourne in the traditional ballad. Martin is a ghost
from Robin’s past. The debt is a personal matter between them; the men are
excluded – and so are we. We
may think that we know Robin Hood well, but there are many things we do not
know about Robin of Locksley… Martin is ruthless,
unscrupulous, selfish, and cynical. He
seems restless, nervous. Is he
a veteran, unsettled by the war experience, or is he evil beyond redemption?
Seven years before
Martin saved Robin’s life, but the circumstances are never explained.
They seem to know each other well, but were they ever friends?
Would a friend demand payment of such a debt – life for life? Both Robin and Martin are intelligent and good looking,
both are skilled warriors with adventurous spirit - but with very different
moral values. We sense the mounting tension and the hostility between them.
And we have the opportunity to watch some superb acting, both by
Richard Greene and Brian Rawlinson. During the final duel
Martin shouted: “Your last chance, Robin; run, and I’ll let you off.
But you’ll owe me your life again”.
Robin could not accept that; it would leave his debt unpaid, and
would mean danger for Marian and Friar Tuck.
Robin had seconds to decide on a solution; he chose a very risky one
– and shocking to watch. It would take an expert archer – and a
remarkable man - for such a plan to succeed.
First he had to judge the angle of Martin’s shot correctly; even a
slight error could be fatal. Then he had to remove the arrow quickly, and shoot
accurately, despite the agonising pain.
Was it a desperate gamble, or did he know from his battle experience
what he could do? Was his
endurance tested to the limit before, all those years ago in the Holy Land? There was a look of
disbelief and horror on Martin’s face, before he fell… “I want to get back
to camp”, said Robin to Will in the closing scene. And he said it with such weariness… I could not help
thinking that this “adventure” was almost too much, even for a man like
Robin of Locksley. (A.F.) |
|||||||||||
| Location - Bodiam Castle, near Robertsbridge, East Sussex | |||||||||||
|
|
Bodiam Castle in “The May Queen”… |
| …in “Ransom”… |
|
|
|
…and in “Food for Thought”. |
If
you have spotted it in any other episodes, please let us know!
|
Bodiam Castle now |
Photograph: Evelyn Modlinger 2004 |
|
Photograph: Evelyn Modlinger 2004 |
The interior of the castle is a ruin; as far as we know, it did not appear in “The Adventures” |
|
Photograph: Evelyn Modlinger 2004 Some interior buildings remain,
with remnants of fireplaces, windows and doorways |
Photograph: Evelyn Modlinger 2004 |
Bodiam is a late medieval castle; it was built in 1385, so it could not have been there at the end of the 12th century. But there was a Saxon hall on the site before the Norman Conquest. After the Conquest it passed to the Bodeham family, who strengthened and expanded it. In the 14th century the manor house was owned by Sir Edward Dalyngrygge. He was given a royal licence to fortify it against possible invasion from France during the Hundred Years War, but decided to build a new stone castle instead. The French invasion never took place, but Bodiam castle was besieged by Richard III in 1484. Later, during the English Civil War, it fell to an assault by the Parliamentary forces. The castle was left to deteriorate for several centuries, until it was acquired by the Marquis of Curzon in 1917. Curzon began a process of restoration, and Bodiam Castle passed to the National Trust on his death in 1925. (A.F.)
Marian: In
“The Coming of Robin Hood” we were introduced to Robin of Locksley, a
brave, kind and honourable knight returning from the Crusades, weary from what
he saw and experienced in war, saddened by the death of his father, and only
wanting to return to his home and resume the life he once knew.
Sadly, it was not to be - the evil powers of the Sheriff stripped him
of everything and forced him to retreat to the forest to take up the life of
an outlaw. In “The Coming” we
learned about the man that Robin of Locksley was, and now, in “The
Moneylender”, we are going to see the man he was forced to become – Robin
Hood. Are they one and the same?
Will Scatlock is the leader of the outlaws – is he
really a leader? They seem like a
band of misfits who only want to rob for their own needs; their only cause is
survival. The camp seemed a bit
chaotic, the leader seemed more like a dictator, not one of the band – he
would shout out his orders, not wanting suggestions, especially not from the
new member, who made him feel uneasy. He
knew this new recruit was no ordinary outlaw.
Will was suspicious of Robin’s intentions –
telling him that they are only trying to stay alive, not to right wrongs.
He seemed envious of Robin’s skills and challenged him to “take a
lesson from the master”. Will was no match for Robin’s skills – when
Will accused him of possibly being a spy and not wanting to do his share,
Robin and Edgar set out on Robin’s first robbery.
The wonderful humour that is always introduced in the series – when
the moneylender was coming along and Edgar told Robin who he was; I loved
Robin’s remark, “Tell me the worst about him so I can commit my first
robbery with an easy conscience”.
You could not help but fall in love with this man -
handsome, brave and kind. This
man, who fought alongside the King, could fight alongside outlaws with the
same ease. He truly represented all that was good – he proved to Will
and the outlaws that they needed the villagers on their side if they were to
keep the Sheriff and his men at bay. He
was an honourable outlaw – when returning money to the villagers he said,
“These are strange times, when the Sheriff protects those who steal, and
brands as thieves those who return the stolen goods.”
It’s an interesting scene when Herbert of Doncaster
the moneylender returns - minus his boots - and tells the Sheriff about being
robbed; he tells him Robin isn’t the usual outlaw.
The look of alarm on the Sheriff’s face when he hears the name –
and when one of his men remarks, “He’s nobody’s fool, he’s a trained
soldier, one of the finest archers in England”, the Sheriff says, “Tell me
something I don’t already know!”
Will in his haste for more gains sets out on a robbery
of wine, which Robin suspects of being a trap.
Robin’s suspicions were correct and in the ensuing battle Will
Scatlock is mortally wounded. Upon dying he says to Robin, “Take my place – you’re
the man they’ll remember – follow Robin – Robin Hood.”
It’s a very emotional scene at the end, when Robin picks up Will’s
sword and says, “A brave man’s sword should not outlive him.”
And he passionately breaks the sword against a stone and tenderly lays
the broken sword on Will’s body.
Robin emerges the true leader that he is.
After losing everything he could have become a bitter and disillusioned
man, but he chose to take the cause of justice – to help those who needed
his help. He was a brilliant
leader who thought no more of himself than he did of his men.
Interesting side note, the actor who played the
moneylender was Leo McKern – the same actor who played Sir Roger De Lisle in
“The Coming” episode; I guess they started “recycling” actors very
early.
Suzette: I thought Robin looked very moody I the opening scenes of
“The Moneylender”, and you could see that he didn’t fit in – he still
looked aristocratic, despite the yeoman’s (?) costume…
I like the second part of
“The Moneylender” – the battle.
I think Richard Greene had the opportunity to make use of his army
training there; have you noticed how he went from a standing to a lying down
position in one practised movement, the way soldiers do?
I don’t know why, but I always see those scenes in my mind’s eye
with rifles, instead of bows and arrows.
And the scene where Hawkins and family are looking at the ruins of
their house – it reminds me of photographs from the Blitz.
It’s very true what Marian
said about the camp being chaotic. But
Robin soon organised them! Not
only did they have military training (“crawling like a snake” – where
was it? “Queen Eleanor”?), but everyone always had work to do!
Very much like the army. (By
the way, I’ve read that King Richard’s army during the Third Crusade was
very well organised, and very professional, compared to other armies in those
days). In later episodes you see
how well everything worked in the camp; they had a routine, and Robin only
gave them very brief instructions – they knew what to do.
(He is a very good organiser, apart from being a great warrior – just
like his mentor King Richard).
I’ve read quite a few Robin Hood stories, and I
think ours has the best explanation how he got the name.
In “The Coming” Edgar said, “the man with the hood”, and then
in “The “Moneylender” Will said, “Robin… Hood”, probably because
that was all he could manage to say.
Do you remember the scene after they burned Hawkins’
house down, when the outlaws come out of the cellar?
Just before they go off the screen to the left, you can see Robin is
coughing, because of the smoke. Little
things like that always make me wonder – was it in the script?
Or did Richard Greene improvise it?
Or perhaps it was accidental – he really was coughing because of the
smoke created on the set, and they just decided to leave it in?
I don’t know why this sort of thing should matter, but it intrigues
me!
Lady of
Locksley: As a child I didn’t realise that Robin wasn’t always their
leader. I didn’t realise that
he had been a soldier in the Crusades, so it has been very nice watching the
episodes in their original order.
He really changed the outlaw’s whole way of life,
and I suppose their reason for staying in the forest rather than fleeing far
away. They became the friends and
helpers of the local people and the poor old Sheriff must have hated it!
He not only had Robin, the best archer in England, as an enemy, he also
realised that Robin now had allies. He
must have thought and hoped that Robin would admit defeat and leave the area.
I too liked the scene where Robin broke the sword, but
I do hope that swords were much stronger than that in reality.
He showed his leadership and compassion very well in that scene.
Robin was always playful with Edgar, almost using him
as a foil between himself and the other outlaws at first.
I enjoyed his laid-back attitude and when he played the joker with the
moneylender, telling him he was a collector of acorns when they fell out of
his boot.
I wonder if the recycling of actors had anything to do
with contracts for that show. Recently
in the USA a series called “Nero Wolf” did exactly the same.
Actors played different parts each week, and even now it worked.
Marian: Robin
of Locksley was a nobleman, a brave knight but most important of all, a kind
and caring person. He would have
made a wonderful lord of the manor - you could see the way Martha and Tom in
“The Coming” loved him. He
was quickly disillusioned by what he discovered when he returned from the
Crusades. He had almost an
innocent quality about him when Tom warned him about Sir Roger and his people:
“They’ll kill you, unless you kill them first”.
He looked disbelieving when he asked, “Who’d want to kill me?”
My feelings are that
Robin of Locksley and Robin Hood
were one. When he was
forced to retreat to Sherwood Forest, he reflected on all that had happened to
him – the four years of fighting in the Crusades, and instead of a welcome
home greeting upon returning from war, his home and lands were stripped from
him and he was falsely accused of murder.
How much unjust treatment can one person endure?
The true character of the man could be seen by his taking up the cause
not only to clear his name, but also to help his fellow man.
He wasn’t looking for personal gain - he was seeking a better life
for everyone. He was a hero and
champion and his fellow outlaws recognised the leadership qualities in the
man. And Will Scatlock recognised
them, felt threatened by them, but then came to terms with them.
Unfortunately, Will didn’t live long enough to really know this
remarkable person. I know the credit for the episodes has to be given to the
creative group of writers who brought Robin Hood to life, but I personally
don’t think the series would have been as successful as it was
- and we wouldn’t be here celebrating him – if it had not been for
Richard Greene. Every time
I watch him there is something new to discover about his abilities.
Elsbeth: I
liked Will, and I got the impression Robin did, too.
Mostly I thought this episode was about Robin, who had just lost
everything he had, coming to realise that the outlaws weren’t really that
awful and were mostly the victims of injustice.
So he resigned himself to becoming a thief and found out he could do it
with class, by righting some of the wrongs he saw around him.
Marian said it really well when she said that he fought with a King
but could walk with regular men. But
I thought in this episode he was just finding that out about himself, and just
becoming that person. He probably
didn’t have much opportunity in the past.
I see Robin differently than the way everyone summed
it up in the first episode. I
think he came from money and had a comfortable childhood and a sort of easy
life up until this time, and this was really his first taste of injustice.
One thing that is really surprising in this episode is
the humour, after seeing the first episode, which seemed very serious.
It was almost like watching a different program!
I sort of prefer the show with those funny touches added, like when the
sentry shot the arrow with dark feathers and everyone ran for cover except
Edgar. Another funny scene was
when the moneylender was walking through town barefoot and everyone was
laughing. Leo McKern seemed like
a good sport in this episode, compared to how awful he was in the first.
Lady of Locksley: My feelings about Robin of Locksley and Robin Hood
- yes, I do think he was the same person.
I’m sure that the Crusades must have made a real man of him as war
does to anyone, but I think his character was unchanged. As you mentioned, Marian,
the gatekeeper and his wife obviously thought highly of him, and he had kind
regard for them.
What kind of an archer and swordsman was he before he
left for the Crusades, I wonder? Did
King Richard choose him for his skills or because of his position in
“society”?
Suzette: I
think he was an excellent archer and swordsman even then, because his father
taught him everything. His father
was the King’s Chief Forester, so they went hunting often. I imagine Robin was very close to his father…. And I also
think he would have been a wonderful lord of the manor, just like his father
was (there’s something about that in “The Path of True Love”).
I imagine a scene from “the future”, where Robin is teaching his
own son all the things a knight should know…
| A Film a Week for Mr. Greene by John Wells |
|
The following is
reproduced from an
article thought to have been published in 1956. Our thanks go to
Charles Laing for supplying a copy of the original. Twelfth-century Robin Hood with
his daring escapes from the rascally Sheriff of Nottingham is making
twentieth-century television history around the firesides of millions of
viewers. For Richard Greene, as the dashing
and gallant Robin, is the first major Hollywood star (although he is
British) to come to England to make TV films. Now after filming this marathon
series (one episode a week from February, 1955,
to January this year), Mr.
Greene is taking a well-deserved rest.
When I called on him at his home in a quiet mews not an arrow’s
shot from Hyde Park, I found him making last-minute preparations for a trip
to New York and Los Angeles. I was thankful to get out of the
drizzling London rain into a comfortably furnished lounge, accept a cup of
coffee, an American cigarette,
and talk about Richard Greene and Robin Hood. “Just a minute,” said Greene,
“I’ll turn this thing off.” The
“thing” was a small TV set and the BBC lost one afternoon viewer. “Frankly I was a bit worried
before I started making the series,” said Greene.
“Some of these TV productions turn out so cheap and horrible.
But I’m so pleased with all the trouble they’ve taken.” A great amount of trouble
certainly has
been taken, for viewers of The
Adventures of Robin Hood are enjoying one of the most
historically accurate series ever presented on TV. No cameras were allowed to turn
until expert historians had obtained precise details of the twelfth century.
The clothes worn by the cast are replicas of those used in the days
of Richard Coeur de Lion. Even
the castles built by the studio technicians are copies of those standing in
our countryside. A disappointment, possibly, to
Robin Hood’s younger fans is the fact that none of the players wear plate
armour. But, as the research
team pointed out, that
armour had not then replaced chain mail. “Only once have we deviated from
fact,” said Greene, “and that was when we staged a sword fight using
fourteenth-century swords, but even then it was with reluctance and just to
make the fight look better.” “I expect some of the blows used
in the fights have set the viewers wondering.
There was one in particular that gave me few qualms.
We call it in the studio The
Dirty Dog, it’s rather ungentlemanly blow to your adversary’s
stomach, but even this I was assured was completely authentic.” “We were making these films for
nearly a year and I learnt a lot about Robin Hood.
I’m not an expert, mind you, but I can tell you there was little
gallantry or chivalry in those days.” Mr Greene told me, that as, in the
main, the fight scenes are so authentic,
every move has to be carefully scripted.
“It’s rather like a script for a ballet,” he said. Did he, I wondered, have any
difficulty during the rehearsals, keeping one eye on the script and the
other on his opponent’s sword? Hot Shot
“No, I don’t think so,” was
the reply, “I made my stage debut when I was nineteen carrying a spear in Julius
Caesar. Since those days I must have fought with weapons from nearly
every period in history. You
get used to handling them, that’s why when I started Robin Hood it only
took about five minutes practice to get used to the long bow.” “Of course, after all the
practice I’ve had making these films I’m quite a reasonable shot.
Though I hasten to add, not as good as Robin Hood.
I doubt if I could even draw the sort of bow he used.” In America, The
Adventures of Robin Hood have a viewing audience of fifty millions.
“In fact Robin Hood is fast becoming a rival to the cowboys,”
said Greene. Of course, this
brings complications, for Richard Greene is being stamped as Robin Hood.
Was Mr.
Greene pleased about this? He
wasn’t sure. “I’ll know
the answer when I get to the States.” The time came for me to leave, I
glanced out of the window at the pouring rain, pulled my overcoat tightly
round and stepped out into the bleak London weather.
Mr.
Greene resumed packing for his trip to California.
|
| Letters To The Editors | ||
|
Something slightly different in this issue, some thought provoking comments which we would like your responses on.
|
||
|
|
||
| That's All Folks | ||
|
Once again a big thank you to all those who continue to support us with their articles, emails, letters and all manner of cuttings. It is all very much appreciated. Both Anna and I have decided that from the next issue the magazine will be published on a quarterly basis. This means that the next issue of the magazine will be available at the end of March 2005. It only remains to wish everybody all the best for the new year. Best
wishes Anna and Mike |
||
|
|